Evolution Of Management Thought


Evolution of management thought.

v  INTRODUCTION-

The management is not a new science. It is as old as human civilization. The growth of civilization over the centuries can be traced back with the management practices. The life beginning with ancient age has seen different stages of growth. The management too has grown with changing life stages. Therefore, the history of management is referred to as an evolutionary concept. The environmental effects could be seen in the practice of management over the period of time.

The following paragraphs explain the evolution of management thought:-

v  EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT THOUGHT:

The progress of mankind synchronizes with the evolution of management. From the rude life style of the ancient period, the life has reached the ultra-modern stage. The period between these extreme ends stands as an evidence for the organised management efforts.
Until the occurrence of Industrial revolution in the mid of 18th century, the management practices remained quite stable. Industrial Revolution brought revolutionary changes is the production methods, organizational styles, factory system, grouped labour force, transportation, communication etc. The large scale production resulted into worldwide marketing. It added economic relations to social contracts. Therefore, the management was applied to large scale production, maintaining economic relations, extracting maximum work from labours.
But the growth of organisations in size amassed the complexities in human relations. This paved ways for man's quest to search new methods, process, managing relations between the employer and employee. The seeds of modern management thought were sown by Industrial Revolution. There began a new way of looking into the subject matter of management. The following discussion is devoted to pre-scientific management scale.


management thought
Evolution of management thought

Evalution of Scientific Management
The scientific management was initially accepted widely. It was accepted on its merits. They are-
    1. Fayol suggested new methods of production.
2. The scientific methods improved the output and efficiency
3. The organisation was reorganised with functional foremanship.
4.The wage rate was fixed on standard piece-rate.
5.The idea of Taylor is to reward with higher rate for efficient labour and punish inefficient with lower rate.
6.The emphasis is on standardisation, specialization, simplification.
7.Introduced the idea of mental revolution.

Critics -
It was heavily criticised by other thinkers of the same period as follows -
v  No human touch, human relations.
v  Sharp difference between efficient and inefficient beginner.
v  Man was equated with machine
v  The worker was under confusion while working under eight functional experts.
v  Worker was not involved in decision making process
v  The theory is based on unscientific idea.
v  Higher specialisation results into more and more mistakes and fatigues.

Your Friend
Smdsohail

 Follow me on-
Instagram-Skisohotrends


Twitter- Smdsohail8


Facebook Page- Skisohotrend


Our branded shopping site- Soho Online Mart








Share on Google Plus

About Someone Like Sohail

    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments:

Post a Comment